Search for: "Young v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 3,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
United States, a “once-in-a-decade insider trading case” that, he argues, presents “a valuable opportunity to clear the underbrush that has accumulated” in American insider trading law. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:47 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:30 am
By 1977, a total of thirty-five states had ratified the ERA, falling short of the three-fourths of the states prescribed by Article V. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
“Hayuk’s work has been featured widely in popular online and print publications, such as The New York Times (United States), Huffington Post (United States), Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine (United States), Hypebeast (Hong Kong), Arrestedmotion (United States), Laughing Squid (United States), Web Urbanist (United States), NYLON Magazine (United States),… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
Recore, 317 F.3d 194, 197 (2d Cir. 2003); Young v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:27 pm
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm
One last bit of railroad-and-the-law trivia: When young William O. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 3:14 am
Last month, the US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [JURIST report] in eight cases, including Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 6:21 pm
" It truth, it can be both, as the Sixth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
(forthcoming 2025).From SmartCILP:Nicole V. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Shortly after Haberman, the United States Supreme Court rejected the substantial contribution test in Pinter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
” Lord Reed noted dicta in Ahmad v United Kingdom (App nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 & 67354/09) to the effect that segregation for security, disciplinary or protection reasons does not per se violate Article 3. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:15 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
