Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
It was unfortunate that "Mini One Cooper Gearbox" was plainly situated above the statement "Welcome to Independent Gearbox Centre" in smaller print: if that had been the other way around, so that the trading name was clearly "Independent Gearbox Centre" and it had stated below it that the website offered reconditioned gearboxes suitable for Mini One and Cooper cars, no doubt the use of the sign MINI would fall on the right side of the law. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
In reaching its decision, the court is persuaded by the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Molina ex rel. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:50 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
, I thought I was done with that topic until the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit orders the fairly likely stay of the injunction. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Its membership does not include some of the most powerful States: United States, China, India. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:05 am
4thCircuit-Seal.png In drug conspiracy prosecution, law enforcement expert testimony concerning the use of code words in recorded conversations (which was based on experience and testimonial statements from interviews with informants, cooperators and witnesses) did not violate the Confrontation Clause since the experts “presented their independent assessments to the jury” and “did not become mere conduits for that hearsay,” in United… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:40 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................. 4 Johnson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 9:54 am
United States, No. 13-456C, 2017 WL 4768385 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:42 am
Here's a link to CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
