Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 1141 - 1160 of 41,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
 What significance, if any, does the scope of the car leasing business have, and the leasing period? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Apart from that, the opinion 1/09, which has been issued in the meantime by the plenum of the ECJ on March 8, 2011, does not call for adopting another point of view.To read the whole decision (in German) or have a look at the file wrapper, click here. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm by Eric
HathiTrust, 1:11-cv-06351-HB (SDNY Oct. 10, 2012). [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am by Diane Tweedlie
The board in arriving at this conclusion does not deviate from G 1/10 (see point 3).1. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:10 am
Answer #10 If your H-1B CAP case was filed with a beginning work date of October 1, of the present fiscal year, then you are covered under the CAP GAP. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post Promoter Reuters reports that in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post Promoter Reuters reports that in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:04 am by Andrew Abramowitz
The SEC recently issued a long concept release seeking public comment on ways to modernize Regulation S-K, the set of disclosure requirements used both for Securities Act registration statements like Form S-1 and Exchange Act reports like Form 10-K. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
Rule 13d-1(c) - provides that Schedule G can be filed, in lieu of filing Schedule D, within 10 days of the date which the 5% threshold was exceeded if: (i) generally the person has not acquired the securities with any purpose, or with the effect of, changing or influencing the control of the issuer; (ii) the person is not a certain enumerated person; and (iii) the person does not directly or indirectly own 20% or more of the class of equity securities. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am by Romano Beitsma
The appellant points correctly to page 9, lines 10 to 13, in support.Hence, the Board does not share the view of the Examining Division that the cited passage on page 9 merely describes "the process of narrowing down a set of already present candidate views" and that the "origin of this initial set of candidate views ... remains undefined". [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Claim 1 does not exclude the degradation (Abbau) of the proteins in a subsequent step because the claim is directed at a process comprising the steps (a), (b), and (c). [12] The argument of the [patent proprietor] according to which document D14 does not contain any reference to a clear solution is not persuasive either. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:55 am by California Employment Law Letter
Boca The minimum wage in California will increase from $9 to $10 an hour as of January 1. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:00 am by California Employment Law Letter
Boca The minimum wage in California will increase from $9 to $10 an hour as of January 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Does this right apply if a person is “apprehended” and taken involuntarily to a health facility for a psychiatric assessment? [read post]