Search for: "In Interest of Ac" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Innovationpartners) WTO session on GIs, Part of Doha ‘final countdown’ (IP Watch) Global – Copyright Final version of ACTA posted (Michael Geist) (IP Watch) Australia AusPat beta launched (The Patent Librarian’s Notebook) Brazil FIFA, INPI meet re World Cup 2014 and trademarks (IP tango) Canada AC’s ‘Draft Statement of Interim Royalties to Be Collected by the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)’ (Excess Copyright) (Excess… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Public sector tenants were responsible individuals with rights, not a class of people who could not be expected to look after their own interests. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:53 am by David Oxenford
 While the Commission deemed this standard “instructive” for MVPDs, it also noted that, in industry meetings, some cable companies reported that they did not use the AC-3 digital encoding standard on which ATSC A/85 RP was based. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Guest Blogger
Although other companies initially expressed interest, in the final stage of the procurement process only a group led by IBM submitted a bid. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
In its determination, the Court looked at s4 of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and authorities such as the landmark case of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. s4 MCA 2005 states that, in determining best interests, all relevant circumstances should be considered, including the person’s past and present wishes and feelings, and the views of those close to him. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm by Karwan Eskerie
The development of the case law and policy following this decision will be an interesting space to watch. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
A predecessor to section 41(3) was upheld by the High Court on the grounds that the Oireachtas was entitled to conclude that significant resources would unfairly distort the political marketplace in favour of larger parties, well-established interest groups and major candidates with deep pockets, and against the interests of smaller parties or interest groups and minor candidates lacking in similar resources (Colgan v IRTC [2000] 2 IR 490, [1999] 1 ILRM 22, [1998] IEHC 117… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The development of the case law and policy following this decision will be an interesting space to watch. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  In October 2007, Ms Jones applied for a declaration that she owned the entire beneficial interest in the Badger Hall property. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:40 am
**UPDATEThe 271Blog discussed on 26 Dec. an aspect of the PubPat brief:Interestingly, the brief suggests that patent applicants and practitioners are not entirely within the purview of the "public interest":[A]rguments regarding the public interest made by patent holders and patent attorneys should be carefully scrutinized, because they are, in fact, the special interests that benefit from the patent system and what benefits them personally may not actually… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by NL
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 2:12 pm by Lucy Reed
We had an interesting discussion about McKenzie friends and attitudes to them by CAFCASS practitioners. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
He accepts that if regulations are laid his case might not fall within them but claims to have standing under the new approach to Scottish public law title and interest set out in AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, [2012] 1 AC 868, 2011 SLT 106. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:32 am by charonqc
I am puzzled as to why there is so much interest in the PEP figures (profits) published by law firms. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am by Emma Lewis, Olswang LLP
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 7:33 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson The Wall Street Journal's ace national security reporting team - Adam Entous, Siobhan Gorman, Julian Barnes, several others - reported in a very interesting story today that divisions have emerged at the senior levels of the Obama administration over the strategic utility of drone strikes in Pakistan. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2007] 1 AC 359 at [147]. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:13 pm
We get some of the most interesting, and tragically heart rendering cases in the country. [read post]