Search for: "Lloyd v. Lloyd"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
Aviva was entitled to recover the sums paid to Mr Brown for alternative accommodation and the cost of repairs (Direct Line v Fox did not assist Mr Brown). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:48 am
Justice V. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:50 pm
In Schoeps v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
In trying to understand what a "material" breach is, the case, Rueben and Anita Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:44 am
We therefore consider seaworthiness on that basis, where the test has been conveniently restated in the relatively recent case of Garnet Trading and Shipping (Singapore) Pte v Baominh Insurance Co [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep, 589 at para 160. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:20 am
The style of the case is Willoughby v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:12 am
The style of the case is, Columbia Lloyds Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
Enforcement of a Foreign Judgment Action in the Superior Court in Connecticut Seeking to Enforce the California Judgment Default Judgment in California Personal Jurisdiction Due Process Clause Nonsignatory to a Contract Bound by a Forum Selection Clause Contained Therein? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
The judgment appelaed is [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 and will be heard at 10:30am in Courtroom Two by Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:30 pm
(by EFF)Lebron v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:45 pm
Lloyd recommended that the case be dismissed. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
The majority (Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen) hold that section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for the restitution of money paid under a mistake of law, with time beginning to run when the claimant discovers or could with reasonable diligence have discovered their mistake in the sense of recognising that they have a worthwhile claim. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
State Farm Lloyds and Erin Strachan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:27 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
AnimalFeeds International Corp., 2010 Lloyd’s Mar. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Daniels v. [read post]
