Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
However, debt collectors also overstep their bounds with people who are not in a position to file for bankruptcy -- sometimes including people who genuinely don't owe the debt and may be victims of mistaken identity. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:39 pm
Not many people are going to get to the door within five seconds at 6:30 in the morning. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
You may also like …. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
People have leveled a number of criticisms at this doctrine. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
The case of Street v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:06 pm
Florida law allows many different types of people and organizations to serve as the guardian of someone’s estate. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
June 12th marks the anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in the civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
(v) Expressions of concern about constitutionalism are often used as a ‘mask’ (p. 35) to conceal political disagreement with populist movements. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm
As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Matel v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 8:05 am
Appellant relies on People v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm
The answer may simply be caution on Grassley’s part. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:20 am
Even if the words QTIP and gross-up continue to mean something different to tax practitioners than they do to normal people. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:57 pm
The ruling in Pattullo-Banks v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:15 pm
A federal district court in Illinois ruled last week that a business may establish it used reasonable security measures to protect its company secrets by introducing testimony of knowledgeable people that there was an unwritten custom and practice within the industry to keep certain data technical data confidential, even if there was no binding agreement between the customer and vendor.The case is von Holdt v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
The bumble-fuck bullet catchers who could never afford slaves may have believed it. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 pm
In People v Giles (2008 NY Slip Op 09433 [12/2/08]), the Court of Appeals issued an important decision regarding the application of Molineux. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
Times up for USPTO in Wyeth v Kappos Patent owners may also be celebrating this month with the recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that held that the USTPO had erred in calculating patent term adjustments for two patents owned by Wyeth and Elan Pharma International. [read post]
