Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am
One of the four items is completely redacted so I have no idea what it relates to. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
In a court-approved settlement, the plaintiff agreed to return certain items of personal property to his ex-wife. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 6:14 am
Additional Resources: Brookie v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
The defendants, however, stated that the information being sought is no longer in their control as the property where the alleged injuries took place was no longer in their possession. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:24 pm
., v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:22 pm
State (1939)), and the right to leaflet extends even to nonpublic forum government property such as airports (see ISKCON v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 1:00 pm
Cal.) in Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
When you move for the return of property, you're saying, in effect, that the government seized your property in order to do something with it (search it for evidence, which is the usual dynamic when a computer is at issue, or use the item(s) seized as evidence at trial, which is the usual dynamic when the item seized is tangible evidence) but the government has already done what it needed, so you should get your property back. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Whether one is happy with the state of intellectual property law or not, it seems to have worked as advertised in this case. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
There are currently several hospice-related Work Plan items being handled by OIG auditors and investigators. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:35 am
Inventory searches are lawful when they are conducted under standard written procedures for the purposes are safeguarding the arrestee's property, to protect police against false claims of theft or stolen property, and to keep unlawful items out of jails and prisons. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm
In one recent decision, Suprema, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The leading users of OJS are Indonesia (11,827 journals), Brazil (2,912), and the United States (1,130). [read post]
