Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 61,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:55 am
It could even mean the state lacks sufficient grounds to move forward with the case in its entirety. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:54 am
In the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
” Pfeiffer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am
Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
" Furthermore, merely because the officer's stop of Petitioner was determined to be invalid does not mean that his conduct was flagrant.Holding:Assuming arguendo that the police encounter constituted an illegal stop, the ultimate question is more appropriate: whether it was proper for the trial court to grant Petitioner's motion to suppress the evidence. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
Means, 2009 WL 3065089 (Pa.Super. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:41 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
In Mayer v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
King v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Q: What does this mean for me if I live in one of the states that will eventually comply with Real ID? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:56 am
Still, in situations where a stepparent voluntarily receives a stepchild into his or her family and treated the child as a family member, he or she could be considered in loco parentis, meaning he or she assumes an obligation to maintain and support the child. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
Toth v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
Coats v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the federal trial court ruling in Deboer v Snyder as the State of Michigan prepares to appeal the decision. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:29 am
Panduit v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Court of Appeals pointed out recently in Mitchell v. [read post]
