Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D.
First, the Federal Department of the Interior has the sole right to regulate the safety of offshore drilling, to the exclusion of the states. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by Beth Graham
  Most importantly, it was this principle that drove the United States Supreme Court to famously observe in Wilko v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
The State of Assam, AIR 1952 SC 405; Mineral Development Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:35 pm by Chip Merlin
In consequence of the Australian miners’ presence, it may have come about as a description of the hastily carried-out proceedings used to deal with the issue of claim-jumping miners. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:37 am by Robin Shea
Supreme Court agreed to decide this past Monday in the case of Green v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Stephen Page
The farmer lent a churn to the neighbour who returned it in a damaged state. [read post]