Search for: "State v. Prince" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Millette, Jr., Chief Judge, Circuit Court, Prince William County, Virginia--W. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:50 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, states the Internet Stroke Center. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
The decision to make Sweden Protestant was made during the state council (riksråd) in Västerås in 1527. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
” Aside from a speeding ticket, Clark had no adult criminal record in the state of Connecticut as of fall 2009, according to the Independent. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Ilaria Bertini, UK Human Rights Blog: Mortier v Belgium: A landmark decision on euthanasia in the case of mental illness: on the recent decision of the ECtHR on Belgium’s law relating to euthanasia. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
: (SpicyIP), Moving towards the nano age: (SpicyIP), YouTube (Google) and T-Series copyright dispute: (SpicyIP), (TechWhack),  JapanIP Value in Japan - the alternative view: (IAM),South KoreaSouth Korea has been urged to strengthen its intellectual property rules in order to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union: (Intellectual Property Watch)The NetherlandsDutch teenager arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"[A] requirement of evidence of authenticity...applies to all writings whose relevancy depends upon authorship by a particular person" (Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 9-101 [Farrell 11th Ed]). [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
  The Court stated that a term will only be implied if it satisfies the case of “business necessity” or it is “so obvious that it goes without saying”. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]