Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Jones"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] Why § 230 Likely Doesn't Provide Immunity for Libels Composed by ChatGPT, Bard, etc.
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am
LeadClick Media, LLC, 838 F.3d 158, 174 (2d Cir. 2016); Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:05 am
It will be interesting to apply this political theory to decisions due later this term on mutual fund executive compensation (Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:15 pm
No, “Justice” Scalia, I won’t “get over” Bush v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
The story has links to the Scruggs trial subpoena, as well as to other trial subpoenas including one issued to Johnny Jones, the attorney who is suing Scruggs for settlement fees in Jones v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am
In Jones we also once again saw the Court of Criminal Appeals’ jailhouse-lawyer hijacking of this sentence from the Supreme Court’s 1971 Cohen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
The only decision of note was Kanter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
"All three of the trial court judges in Lafayette County Circuit Court recused themselves on the matter of Jones v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Farey-Jones, supra. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
In 2011, he vetoed SB 914, a bill that would have overruled People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
Part III examines those cases in some detail, as well as Jones[6] and Kyllo v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:21 pm
People rarely expect to be sued, period. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
