Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 39,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:18 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution limits the "judicial power of the United States"so that it does not "extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:07 am
Colvin, No, August 2, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Worker Taxed Thousands for Social Security Disability Benefits He Never Received, June 21, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
The Rule defines the statutory term “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act, and has been subject to appeals in both federal district courts and courts of appeals. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
United States, 838 F.3d 1272, 1276 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:22 am
A case pending before the United States Supreme Court, Caniglia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Two days before the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bissonnette v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:21 pm
United States of America, decided on May 13. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:06 pm
The former, said the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts last month in Martin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:23 am
United States, the defendant is requesting that the United States Supreme Court grant certiorari in his case, to address the issue of when an individual can be seized for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
