Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 13,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2024, 2:02 am
And while you’re at it, go ahead and add in some slides on discrimination and retaliation. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
Preston which of these groups — I’m going to name some groups — you’re authorized to go after under the 9/11 AUMF? [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:19 pm
You're worried about a lawsuit? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:35 am
In other words, even if the medical certification indicates that the employee will need intermittent leave for a period in excess of six months (e.g., for a lifetime condition), the employer is be permitted to request re-certification every six months in connection with an absence. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:35 am
In other words, even if the medical certification indicates that the employee will need intermittent leave for a period in excess of six months (e.g., for a lifetime condition), the employer is be permitted to request re-certification every six months in connection with an absence. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:38 am
A close cousin of the apology is the retraction (e.g., "I take it back. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:58 am
(See, e.g., Ruiz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
See, e.g., id. at 417 ... [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm
Just because they have good intentions doesn’t mean they won’t lead you astray (e.g. this advice on Twitter is a good example). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
We saw it in 2D, not because we're cheap, but because the 2 1/2 year old won't keep the glasses on. [read post]
6 May 2010, 3:00 am
The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure provides that a mark should be refused registration if it consists of matter that is primarily geographically descriptive of the goods and services offered under the mark (e.g., CALIFORNIA CLOTHIERS for tailoring services based in California) or is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive of them (e.g. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:19 am
In re Omniome, Inc., Serial No. 87960945 (June 18, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:07 am
Note the hours of the patrols (e.g. 7 p.m. to 3 a.m.; 8 p.m. to 2 a.m., etc). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:21 am
See, e.g., In re Sela Prods., LLC, 107 USPQ2d 1580 (TTAB 2013) (purchasers of surge protectors for home theater systems would encounter wall mounts and brackets used in connection with such systems). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
In re Cynthia Dumas, Serial No. 87345342 (August 24, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 2:30 am
Should it re-apply? [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:27 am
TTABlog comment: So maybe applicant should put some stars next to the mark, and re-file? [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 6:21 am
Unfortunately, that makes it seem as though you're conceding that you're in Alexander's "everyone" category. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:46 am
Applicant cited other third-party registrations (e.g., AMERICAN HORSE FOUNDATION) in which no similar disclaimer is found. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
See, e.g., In re Major League Umpires, 60 USPQ2d 1059, 1062 (TTAB 2001) (finding the mark MAJOR LEAGUE UMPIRES for baseball gear was merely descriptive because the Applicant was a business created and owned by former Major League baseball umpires). [read post]
