Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1161 - 1180
of 13,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
That said, we’re not convinced that this recent decision is reliable enough to conclude that “revolutionary” or “breakthrough” claims never require substantiation as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Clerk: I need you to re-sign the back of your credit card to match the signature on your driver’s license.Me: Are you joking? [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:08 am
They can compile a significant amount of evidence, as they did in the Carey case, before they have to say, “hold it, we’re investigating this and they’re talking about that. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York described how the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment may be used by employers to pay—i.e., “pick off”—individual plaintiffs to defeat a broader and significantly more costly FLSA collective action in his recent opinion in Anjum v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:22 pm
The upshot, I guess, is that, if you’re interested at all in what jurors watch, it’s not because you’re worried their views have been shaped by those shows, but because what they watch may reflect how deeply they hold certain beliefs in the first place. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am
That said, we’re not convinced that this recent decision is reliable enough to conclude that “revolutionary” or “breakthrough” claims never require substantiation as a matter of law. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:30 am
We’ll see you when you’re 100% cured, or not. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 5:24 am
” The report makes clear that this refers to individual people, rather than cases (i.e. people with many cases are not being counted multiple times). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Judge Newman in dissent from the denial of the petition for re-hearing in Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
In re Perrotta, 2007 WL 3307256 (Bankr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
We're going to keep building more homes and businesses that waste less energy so that you're in charge of your own energy bills. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
And Rule 60(b)(5) involves precisely the situation presented here: when (in the express words of the rule) "the judgment . . . is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated;" i.e., when (as here) the final judgment was based on applying res judicata from a prior judgment that was subsequently reversed.So in federal court, you don't file a second duplicative suit. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
What to Wear Dark suit (i.e. black, charcoal, navy, gray) Hair: tidy and not overly sprayed/gelled. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:28 am
Most are clarifications of existing exceptions.The principal change is new sub-paragraph (s) which provides a new exception for residential real property transferred to a relative who is related by blood or affinity to the first degree (i.e., children). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:09 am
Some people refer to these as "noisufnoc" cases, i.e., reverse(d) confusion. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:44 am
A discrimination claim, or claims under other laws that protect employees but not contractors (i.e., the FMLA). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
In re JWB Wine LLC, Serial No. 86163390 (February 24, 2016) [not precedential].Applicant's maintained that that "there are distinct differences within the range of beers categorized as ales. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 3:55 am
In re Austin Brothers’ Beer Company LLC, Serial No. 86545695 (December 13, 2016) [not precedential].Of course, the involved goods are identical, and there are no limitations on channels of trade or classes of consumers in the application or cited registrations. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:48 am
In re Marissa Paine, Serial No. 90039694 (May 1, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:16 am
" In re Wenger S.A., Serial No. 85157939 (May 14, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
