Search for: "L. C. v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 9:14 am
United States, 441 U.S. 238, 258, 99 S. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 721 F.2d 1305, 1314-15 (Fed.Cir.1983); Ammex, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
Berg, James L. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Comme l’a dit le juge Holmes, il y a plus de soixante ans, le fait que la teneur particulière du message d’une personne puisse [TRADUCTION] “inciter à l’intolérance” n’est pas une raison pour lui refuser la protection car [TRADUCTION] “s’il existe un principe de la Constitution qui exige de façon plus impérative le respect que tout autre c’est le principe de la liberté de… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
V, VI, IX, and XIV,NJ Constitution 1, paras.1, 10, and 2], and requirements stated in Miranda v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:51 am
2365, 144 L. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:52 pm
VI of the United States Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, because federal regulation of marijuana as a controlled substance preempts state authority to enact c. 94G. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:55 pm
" The instant case resembles the circumstances of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
E.g., C. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
