Search for: "People v. David"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 5,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
David D. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am
David Robertson, The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review (Princeton University Press, 2010) 432 pages. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
People were so upset when I used the word Muslim. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
David Donoghue. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
David Nelson Memorial Keynote LectureIntroduction by Andrew E. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
This term the Supreme Court will be hearing a case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 5:05 am
Joe dialed toned the guy.At the time there were only a few people who knew I was here. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
Owens, and Jesinoski v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
EPA and American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Precisely because their fear was both palpable and infinitely reasonable.I understand and appreciate that other people might perhaps disagree, and I agree with Judge Beezer that it's a lot easier to make anonymous threats on the internet than to actually beat people up.But let me make just three simple points.(1) People are actually beat up. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:38 pm
In a blogpost about the Microsoft/Alacatel business (Who cares who the real patent winner is in the Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:41 pm
From People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:54 am
"*Act V has yet to be written. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
(Yeah, yeah - some of you are sputtering that Larry David is real. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
In its deliberations, the Grand Jury would examine whether a potential defendant had a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent or terminate a burglary, and that inquiry would employ a "reasonableness standard" which has both objective and subjective elements (see People v Wesley, 76 NY2d 555, 559; People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96, 112). [read post]
