Search for: "People v. Jack"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
They add that "a search for belonging, purpose, adventure, and friendship, appear to remain the main reasons for people to join the Islamic State. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
First, Jack Goldsmith has argued that such application requires a statutory “clear statement” that such statutes apply. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
A host of commentators (respectively, Ashley Deeks, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Bethlehem, Goldsmith again, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin and Marty Lederman) have weighed-in on why Egan’s definition of “imminence” may seem familiar. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:02 am
According to Nguyen v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
There is, of course, yet a third meaning of “fixed” that is available, as when people speak of “fixing” their dogs or cats, by which they mean neutering the animals and making it impossible for them to generate a next generation of puppies or kittens. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
As evidence of this trend, consider the Court’s decision in American Legion v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Because it allows people to -gasp- criticize people like them aloud. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
I don’t know how many of these people might be alive today if just one of the several hundred people locked in Norris Hall had a weapon, but I do know that all of these people had a right to life and a right to defend it. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
(Easterling v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
On my left: the edge of the off-ramp, a modest guardrail, and a fifty-foot drop. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
By Atreya Mathur In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
