Search for: "People v. Samuels"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2022, 1:41 pm
The health care vaccine case In Biden v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
In a new episode of First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Ian Samuel recap the latest developments in the Kavanaugh confirmation battle. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:37 pm
Justice Samuel A. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
In 1986, in a case called Batson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
What have Samuel Beckett, James Joyce, George B Shaw, and William B Yeats in common? [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm
The law at the center of the case, Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Hicks in 1987 through Florida v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
Byrd v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:38 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm
Wade, the “ultimate judicial usurpation” and piles his own dollop of foam on the ‘Obama v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
But Justice Samuel A. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:31 am
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Green defended the Mississippi abortion statute currently before the Supreme Court this term in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
In a dissent from denial of cert. that wound up just one vote short, Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, urged that “nothing in our precedents clearly establishes the[] admissibility [of such recantations] as a matter of federal constitutional law. [read post]
