Search for: "Spells v. State" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 1:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Spelling out in the engagement letter that the lawyer is not authorized to bind the client to arbitration? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:23 pm
., who spent the first three pages of his opinion in McKenna v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by SHG
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman posts part of the Constitution Projects' statement urging Congress to enact legislation to ensure that federal prosecutors fulfill their obligations under Brady v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Long recalled that the last of those restoration decisions, in the 1962 case of Enochs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
"Merpel wonders if this spells trouble in troll settlement paradise. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm by Roy M. Doppelt
The state Supreme Court declared surrogacy agreements constitutional in a 1993 case entitled Johnson v. [read post]
, or from unique businesses concerning services, merchandise or priceless antique art work you could never afford and most likely didn't buy even if you were under the influence of drugs, alcohol or Antiques Roadshow.If you may have been a vicim of identity theft in Clearwater, Florida and believe your information has been compromised this web page has information on what to do next.As to the legal ramifications of identity theft here is a synopsis of yesterday's important 11th… [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm by Roy M. Doppelt
The state Supreme Court declared surrogacy agreements constitutional in a 1993 case entitled Johnson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by admin
In Peugh v United States, SCOTUS ruled federal criminal defendants must be sentenced under the guidelines in effect when the crime took place, not higher guidelines in place when the defendant is sentenced. [read post]