Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 7:19 am
In, State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
GSK v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Here is IP Thinktank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
The California case Snukal v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:52 pm
Charles Arthur at the Guardian asked whether the site’s editors had violated California state law by buying stolen property. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
International Trade Commission12-552Issue: Whether the initial authorized sale outside the United States of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:38 am
Claims of this kind are not infrequent in your state or in other states, where Community Property prevails, and it is seldom that we have a case where it is not determined that some part of the proceeds should go to the spouse. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
§2031.030(c) states: Each demand in a set shall be separately set forth, identified by number or letter, and shall do all of the following: (1) Designate the documents, tangible things, land or other property, or electronically stored information to be inspected, copied, tested, or sampled either by specifically describing each individual item or by reasonably particularizing each category of item. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm
”[27] The Proscribed Modes of Prevention Aside from instituting criminal sanctions, another leading purpose of the Nicosia Convention was to outline state’s preventative obligations.[28] A resounding message throughout the text is the encouragement of states to further domestic measures. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 9:21 am
Prior blog post. * Inside Higher Ed: Students lose interest in Yik Yak, a relief for administrators * State v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:22 am
Government property in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
The case is Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:01 am
(Thanks, Tom, for providing this item). [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsLinda Huff Browder, Appellant,v.Cecil Ray Browder, Jr., Respondent. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
The legal authority for a transfer is questionable (see "Domain Names as Property Subject to Creditor Claims--Bosh v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:44 pm
Thus the statute does not deal with the problem of ascertaining the items used in computing income or the allowable items of expense. [read post]
