Search for: "State v. Mart" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am by Nabiha Syed
Mike Dorf recaps an ABA webinar on last Term’s animal cruelty “crush video” case, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Shu-Yi Oei
However, in March, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico ruled in Wal-Mart Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In sum, these rulings, and a similarly pro-corporate, anti-litigant ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am by Kali Borkoski
Iqbal (and its precursor, Twombly), Wal-Mart v. [read post]