Search for: "United States v. Harris"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 2,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-9711, Jackson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:10 am
See State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/04/09-50113.pdf United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:29 am
Its last sentence provides that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:05 pm
United States . . .; United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000), the United States Supreme Court held that internal agency interpretations and memorandums have the power of persuasion only. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
United States (meaning of “use”) and Muscarello v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
United States (meaning of “use”) and Muscarello v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
Second, while some states have made the legislative choice to disallow mandatory agency fees (as they are free to do), others have entered into longstanding union contracts that include agency fee provisions; as Justice Kagan observed in her dissent in Harris v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps surveys the eight immigration cases awaiting decision at the court, observing that “history may record this term as a blockbuster in one area that has become eerily relevant to America in 2017: how much due process is owed to immigrants, undocumented aliens, aliens outside the United States—and even naturalized citizens. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
That critique reached a new peak in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am
For instance, tariffs on components for products made in the United States may be eliminated, as well as products made by the China operations of US companies. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
United States, 364 U.S. 206, 222 (1960). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:26 pm
Solicitor General Daryl Joseffer for the United States as amicus. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
