Search for: "Abbe Gluck"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 4:12 pm
., Abbe Gluck’s recent Politico piece, or her various posts at Balkinization, e.g., this one).** This is a variation on a theme Cannon recently whistled, when he asked, “What If We Applied the IRS’s Reasoning in Halbig& King to the Patriot Act or RFRA, Instead of the ACA? [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:10 am
Gluck. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:34 pm
But under the twin aims, because a New York state court deciding an unsettled question of Pennsylvania law would ignore the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s likely decision and presume that Pennsylvania law is like New York law, a federal court in New York should presume that Pennsylvania law is like New York law too. 3) Abbe Gluck has suggested that it follows from Erie that a federal court in New York interpreting a… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:06 pm
Gluck and Michael J. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:16 pm
Adler and Abbe R. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
” At The Volokh Conspiracy, Jonathan Adler responds to Abbe Gluck’s post on the grant in King for this blog; he contends that, if the Court limits its inquiry to the text of the ACA, “it should conclude that the IRS tax credit rule is unlawful. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
” Abbe Gluck and Anne Joseph O’Connell analyze the opinion in Azar v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
Erbsen * Catherine Finlayson * Linda Foa * Hanna Gafni * Judy Gallent * Abbe Gluck * Deirdra Govan * Cory Erin Haber * Angie Hancock * Laura Jean Hawkins * Kimberley A. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
This blog’s preview came from Abbe Gluck and Anne Joseph O’Connell. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
Although “interpretive pronouncements” are probably not binding on future panels, see Abbe R. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Stringer At 49 Grove 49 Grove Street at Bleecker Street in the West Village Conveniently located by the 1 train at the Christopher Street Station, the A B C D E F V trains at the West 4th Street Station and the PATH train at the 9th Street Station $250 Benefactor, $100 Patron, $50 Sponsor, $20 Guest Host committee in formation:Benefactors: Abbe Gluck * Alisa Schierman * Andrew Tulloch * Carlos A. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog; contributors to our “snap symposium” on the grant included Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Jonathan H. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am
But I knew that the administration’s defenders such as Abbe Gluck and Nick Bagley had a reasonable-sounding if perhaps overly-complex argument, which was based on the text of the statute, rather than on either improper appeals to its overall purpose or to implausible assertions of scrivener’s error. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Rob Weiner In prior posts, I have described Halbig v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Rather textualism requires the Court to consider the meaning of particular provisions in light of the entire text of the law.A brieffiled by Thomas Merrill, Gillian Metzger, Abbe Gluck, and Nicholas Bagley discusses the different forms of federalism represented in government programs and demonstrates that a prohibition on premium tax credits for federal exchanges is inconsistent with the kind of cooperative federalism program represented by the ACA marketplaces. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
For example, as shown by the pioneering work of Abbe Gluck and Lisa Bressman, the Chevron doctrine represents a nearly unique example of an interpretive canon well known to and understood by the staff who draft legislation. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Allina Health Services, which asks whether the Department of Health and Human Services was required to conduct notice-and-comment rulemaking before altering its Medicare hospital-reimbursement formula, comes from Abbe Gluck and Anne Joseph O’Connell. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
” At Politico Magazine, Abbe Gluck contends that, “[a]t long last, the federalism implications of the Obamacare challenge . . . appear widely understood. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:33 pm
Kalal was one of several examples used by Professor Abbe Gluck over a decade ago to show that, despite ideological differences, state courts have settled into a “methodological consensus” about a form of “modified textualism” for statutory interpretation. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
As Abbe Gluck has explained, Roberts used the case to write a “game-changing statutory interpretation opinion. [read post]
