Search for: "American Trade Partners v. A-1 INTERN. IMPORTING"
Results 101 - 120
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
(EFF) Ruminations on IP due diligence (IPKat) More news on the soon-to-launch International IP Strategists Association (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands The future of copyright: WIPO’s vision (1709 Blog) WIPO launches new on-line tool to facilitate brand searches (WIPO) Global – Patents Cost-effective international patenting strategies (inovia’s Foreign Filing Blog) Intellectual Property Today top patent firms list for 2011 released (Maier &… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
Circuit Court of Appeals 10-10038 and International Airport Centers LLC v Jacob Citrin in the 7th U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
A few brief observations: 1. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
(NIEO ¶ 1).The Wheel has turned indeed; what was dead has been reanimated; an old spirit long thought quite dead has been reborn. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
International uptake of key elements was swift: by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the European Union, the International Organization of Standardization, the International Finance Corporation, the Human Rights Commission of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the General Assembly of the Organization of American States, and the African Union, as well as by scores of individual states and businesses—even by the… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. / No, DED Brigham and Women’s Hospital Inc. et al v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Effective execution is equally important. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
It also provided an opportunity to understand the way that these important people tend to understand the China's OBOR from an American perspective. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am
Many Americans are underbanked and the costs of cross-border money transfers and payments are high. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
A.V.E.L.A., Inc (IP Whiteboard) Precedential No. 22: TTAB renders split decision in CURE4KIDS 2(d) oppositions: American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm
Kohn, partner at Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, an expert in whistleblower law. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Legal Research, Legal Reasoning and Precedent in Canada in the Digital Age Jonathan de Vries is a Partner at Shillingtons LLP in London, Ontario and a PhD Candidate at Western University. (2018) 48 Advocates’ Quarterly 1. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am
That opinion overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
Thursday, Jan. 16, 8:30 a.m.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold an event featuring the European Commissioner for Trade Phil Hogan on new trade goals set by the European Commissionto create a level playing field, strengthen Europe’s global trade leadership, build sustainable trade in light of climate change and make trade more transparent. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
(Patentology) Canada A masterpiece of trade-mark clarity: Supreme Court of Canada decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]