Search for: "Anthony v. C. I. R" Results 101 - 120 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Anthony Califano and Lynn Kappelman On April 12, 2013, a federal judge in the Western District of Pennsylvania issued an order striking Plaintiff’s class claims in Semenko v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Several years ago, I published a list of state-specific Family Law blogs. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Before John Roberts and Neil Gorsuch sided with LGBT rights, so did Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and D [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Generally, “[i]f the non-custodial parent is ordered to provide such benefits, the custodial parent’s pro rata share of such costs shall be deducted from the basic support obligation” (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b] [c][5][ii]). [read post]