Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 101 - 120 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Plaintiffs’ damage expert then developed comprehensive damage exposure models according to the theories of liability and the available damages under the substantive law in each case (e.g., wage deductions, deceptive trade practices, rescission, and unjust enrichment). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Lorene Park
One employee won summary judgment as to her employer’s liability for FMLA interference after a federal court in Pennsylvania rejected the employer’s argument that FMLA leave is limited to medical emergencies. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am by azatty
We can barely count how many cases dealing with controversial or cutting-edge subjects seem to come up in Arizona. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
 Conditioning liability on lack of consent, as endorsed in Section 213.2, is consistent with the trend to recognize sexual assault as an infringement on personal autonomy rather than only as unjustified force or coercion. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am by Lorene Park
In one case, a Missouri employer gave an employee 24 weeks of maternity leave in 2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
In Arizona, if an employee has worked in the state for 60 days in a year, the employer is required to do withholding. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Because Section 11 is a strict liability statute, the court noted, plaintiffs do not have to show scienter. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
EG said the Carney case was referred to him from another attorney, the late CC. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm by Daniel Hemel
So far, I’ve only addressed Vanguard’s potential liability for back taxes. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm by Daniel Hemel
So far, I’ve only addressed Vanguard’s potential liability for back taxes. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:43 pm by Daniel Hemel
So far, I’ve only addressed Vanguard’s potential liability for back taxes. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although the Supreme Court would later decide that Title IX and Title VII should be interpreted differently with respect to institutional and employer liability for harassment (see Gebser v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
”  Id. at 935.Arizona:  The Arizona Supreme Court in Rawlings v. [read post]