Search for: "Axe v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
The law, in its preamble, stated these objectives: WHEREAS, the People’s Republic of China is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage…. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
Presumably that axes the recent turmoil in credit markets. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am
Federal Election Commission, and filled in some new details about the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that led to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:28 am
Now, on both sides of the Atlantic, conservative politicians are engaging in their own serious arguments over whether defense money should be on the table when the budget cutters enter with their axes and scalpels.In the United Kingdom, where the new Conservative-Liberal coalition government has pledged major league austerity to drive down the country's record peace-time deficits, a row has ensued between the defense minister and chancellor of the exchequer (treasury minister)… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
United States, 136 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Personal as well as institutional characters admit to value plurality: their goodness or badness cannot be judged along just one or two normative axes. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is Mr. 2 001.240 State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 10:29 am
State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
The review will reportedly examine how the United States engages with families of those kidnapped, its methods of intelligence collection, and its diplomatic missions to rescue hostages. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United Techs. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
Why take an axe to these industries? [read post]
