Search for: "Barclay v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
Last Week in the Courts The judgment in the case of Barclay v Tuck [2018] EWHC 1125 (QB) – handed down on 14 May 2018 – has recently become available. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
A defect in the verification of the copy of a pleading served upon a party is insufficient to bar filing of a pleading, provided that the original pleading submitted to the Department for filing includes a proper verification (Appeal of K.M. and T.M., 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,095, pet. to rev dsmd sub nom Carthage UFSD v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
Lord Justice Sales, who delivered the main judgment, was guided by the reasoning of the House of Lords in Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank plc [2006] UKHL 28, which determined that a defendant’s duty of compliance is owed to the court, of which the remedy for non-compliance is punishment for contempt, not civil damages. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 3:25 am
Barclays Agrees to Pay $2 Billion in Civil Penalties to Resolve Claims for Fraud in the Sale of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities /Two Former Barclays Executives Agree to Pay $2 Million to Resolve Claims Brought Against Them Individually (DOJ Press Release)https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/barclays-agrees-pay-2-billion-civil-penalties-resolve-claims-fraud-sale-residential-mortgageIn the United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
The second question asks what evidence must be put forth by a plaintiff seeking to rebut the presumption (Barclays PLC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Bigsby v Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., 170 F. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
” The district court also stated that the evidence failed to “conclusively” sever the link between the alleged misstatements and Goldman Sachs’s stock price. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
Barclays PLC (here). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:00 am
Myers v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Jesner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
