Search for: "Blackman v. Blackman" Results 101 - 120 of 1,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Ilya Somin
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)Today, the Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:52 am by Ted Frank
Blackman notes some amusing asides in Justice Kennedy's concurrence. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:59 am by NCC Staff
Josh Blackman is an Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:05 pm by charley foster
Josh Blackman, who was present at this morning's oral argument, prefaces his analysis by stating -The Court was not at all receptive to arguments on Privileges or Immunities but incorporation on Due Process is a slam dunk.Meanwhile, SCOTUSblog says - The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that right. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:53 am
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in Latoya Blackman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:16 pm by Howard Bashman
Google was so joyful; You can tell how much he relished writing this technical decision”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” along with a post titled “Did Justice Thomas Cover for Justice Barrett’s Vote To Deny Cert To Reconsider TWA v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 7:15 pm
  “Much Ado About Dictum; or, How to Evade Precedent Without Really Trying: The Distinction between Holding and Dictum“ JOSH BLACKMAN, George Mason University - School of Law From the birth of our Republic, starting with Chief Justice Marshall in Cohens v. [read post]