Search for: "Board v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 28,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
State Board of Equalization, 191 Cal.App.4th 1259 (2011) and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm by centerforartlaw
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Second Circuit will be hearing the appeal of the district court decision in Leroy v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
But in the mid-1900s, the Court made clear that such statements couldn't be punished, at least unless they involved threats of violence and the like (see, e.g., Bridges v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:04 am by Noah Chauvin
Senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:50 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Superior Court … Appeals Board En Banc Decisions Gonzalez (Guillermo) v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:50 am by Janet Lord
In contemporary times, more sophisticated syndicates target persons with disabilities for economic exploitation, as in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Proposed Rule states that the FDIC has seen a correlation between brokered deposits and an increased “probability of failure and higher losses to the DIF upon failure. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 628-29 (1935)(limiting the holding in Myers v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
The Resolution provides that the: President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to— (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. [read post]