Search for: "Body v. Taylor"
Results 101 - 120
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
When Marjorie Taylor Greene came under fire for propagating lies about Jewish space lasers and other fantastical conspiracy theories, she did not apology. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:37 am
Introduction to Lebron v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:37 am
Introduction to Lebron v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
Taylor, supra. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
In addition, Civil Service Law Section 209-a.6, a subdivision that is part of the Taylor Law, provides that “In applying this section, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
City of Schenectady and Andriano v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:25 am
Pathology v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
The next day, July 15, the body was identified as Nancy. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
In this week’s case (Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
(See Affidavit of Taylor Cratsley, dated November 21, 2016). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm
Fourteen years later, a Pennsylvania court recognized that a physician might not be the best expert on nursing standards, but it still allowed physicians' testimony to be admitted because, "all areas of medical expertise within the knowledge of nurses are also within the knowledge of medical doctors" (Taylor v Spencer Hospital, 292 A2d 449, 452 [Pa Super 1972]). [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
`The human body is infinitely variable, and the machine assumes that all human bodies have identical characteristics, which they don’t. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
I think this week’s ruling in Burdick v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
The difference between Herbst and claim 1 is the absence in Herbst of a receiver means that is removably mounted in a main body. [read post]
