Search for: "Boeing Co. v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 20, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black male's age and race/failure-to-promote + retal + HWE claims5th Circuit* Barnett v The Boeing Co., No. 08-20232. (5th Cir. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 12, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of fem projectionist's sex harass-by-male-supervisor claim but affirming dismissal of co-worker sex harass and constructive discharge claims> Trujillo v BOE of Albuquerque, No. 08-2029 (10th Cir. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Boeing Co. discusses lawyers who use “manipulation or impropriety” to disqualify the trial judge “to whom the case has been randomly assigned. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Iowa was the only state with a lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of a felony. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
To my knowledge, as of today, Boeing and the FAA both have details about defects in software used in Boeing's 737 Max airplanes that contributed to the crashes of two 737 Max airplanes that killed hundreds of people. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
The Boeing Co., No. 09 C 3722, Slip op. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:29 am
In our follow-up article on Boeing Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:16 pm
Circuit’s holding in Penrod v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
That may be because with this decision and earlier decisions in Marchand and In re Boeing Co. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who is a co-sponsor of the bill. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm
The trend here is, first, get out of state court! [read post]
