Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
§ 541(c)(2). [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:40 am
The need for translations, however, is a matter of the lex fori processualis. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
C. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Decision G 1/05 [3.6] states: “Thus in opposition proceedings under A 100(c) it is a ground of revocation that the subject-matter of the European patent granted on a divisional application extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Articles of incorporation typically identify: (a) The organization’s name; (b) Purpose or purposes of the nonprofit; (c) Agent for service of process — that is, a person whose name and address are identified and who can receive lawsuits and other official correspondence and other matters; and (d) Any limitations on corporate powers. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
, In re PSE&G Shareholder Litigation, 726 A.2d 994, 997 (N.J. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
Tax Matters. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:58 am
L. c. 272, § 31, does not encompass electronically transmitted text, or "online conversations," for the purposes of a prosecution for attempted dissemination of matter harmful to a minor under G. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 10:39 am
G. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 10:41 am
G. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
Decisions G 1/05 and G 1/06 were made in the context of divisional applications. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:54 am
” The single justice reported the matter to the full SJC. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
See 9 FAM 601.7-3(c)(2)(a)(“Correspondence with Representatives of Record, Attorneys”). [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The composition of the Enlarged Board was subsequently changed by an order dated 20 May 2021 of the Chairman of the Enlarged Board in case G 1/21.XIII. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Based on decision T 384/91 in connection with decision G 1/93, and on decision G 9/91, it reasoned as follows: In decision G 1/93, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) had defined the conditions under which a patent could be maintained unamended despite it containing subject matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
The objection is raised against claim 14, which the [opponent] argued to be directed to an essentially biological process for the production of animals.[3] This objection has not been mentioned in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal, but the Board notes that the opposition was originally filed inter alia on the ground that the subject-matter of the patent was not patentable under A 53(b) […].[4] The [opponent] has explained that it decided to raise the objection in view… [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:51 pm
If both R and partner G(rinder) can do equivalent quality legal work, then, for costing purposes, both R and G should figure in to the cost at the same hourly rate. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
