Search for: "CLASS v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
This question in the title of this post came up in a recent class. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has allowed a putative class action under Michigan law to proceed against several magazine publishers that allegedly sold lists of their customers’ names, addresses, and subscription choices to third parties. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:56 am
In Copp v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
Here is a list of those cases with some of Professor Coffee’s insights: Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust Funds v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
The biggest problem for the defendant was a 1980 decision (Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Jenkins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:44 pm
Usually, there will be one person who is the representative of the class (for instance, one of the most famous class actions of all time, Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
Marotto v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
In the first case, Birchmeier v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Yack v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Appleseed suggested that jailing Class B and C misdemeanor defendants for longer than a few days worsens recidivism prospects and harms public safety:In a groundbreaking study of defendants in Kentucky jails, low-risk defendants held at least 2 to 3 days were almost 40% more likely to commit a new crime before trial than a low-risk defendant held no more than 24 hours. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:17 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York has granted the plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment and class certification in Zimmerman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:00 am
Amazon, 2023 FC 1156 and Watson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
Read it here. http://www.geeklawblog.com/2012/03/rise-of-third-party-litigation-funding.html 10 ways to defend class actions using Walmart v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals last week affirmed a denial of class certification in Pilgrim v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Franklin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
That policy is more important than ever because, when defendants demand it, class action bans laundered through pre-dispute arbitration clauses are likely to be enforced under the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
See Boschma v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:38 am
La Sala [class action plaintiff challenged defendant's loan acceleration clause; defendant waived enforcement of the clause against plaintiff]; Branick v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
The list of topics and speakers is impressive. [read post]
