Search for: "California v. Campbell" Results 101 - 120 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm
Last year was the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am by Rob
11/17/2010 Update: The California Supreme Court granted review of Kirby v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 6:07 am
On January 14, 2022, the US District Court for the Northern District of California denied an individual defendant’s motion to dismiss in SEC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
 (Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 2:00 am
  However, in 1994, the US Supreme Court decided a similar case, Campbell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 7,972,022 (the ‘022 patent), 7,510,290 (the ‘290 patent), 7,429,117 (the ‘117 patent), 7,318,652 (the ‘652 patent), and 6,948,823 (the ‘823 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California Ikan Corporation of Houston, Texas Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles,… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
” The court also relied on two recent federal decisions (Campbell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 34842 (WD WI, March 20, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that his religious freedom was infringed when he was denied the right to wear a Rosicrucian emblem.In Campbell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm by Curt Cutting
Related posts: California Supreme Court denies review in Bankhead v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]