Search for: "Campbell v. Holder" Results 101 - 120 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") has sued Joseph M. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am by Devlin Hartline
Not All Copyright Owners Can Exploit The Copyright By way of context, the Ninth Circuit’s en banc majority opinion in Silvers v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
  For example, the copyright holder can also sue for copyright infringement, which could increase damages by as much as $150,000. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
  For example, the copyright holder can also sue for copyright infringement, which could increase damages by as much as $150,000. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The authors point out that Justice Souter suggested just such a possibility in a footnote to the Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Id. at 45 (footnotes omitted) (citing Badasa, 540 F.3d at 909; Campbell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As private law, enforcement decisions are delegated to rights holders. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am by WSLL
Langer of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming.Date of Decision: May 31, 2012Facts:  After the owner of a construction project in Campbell County defaulted on its obligations to various creditors, mortgage holder Pinnacle Bank foreclosed on the real property securing its mortgage. [read post]