Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 101 - 120 of 1,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am by Ryan Goodman
It is accordingly proper, indeed necessary, to evaluate whether the criminal statute at issue is a close match for the alleged conduct in the case. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
” At some point after Pomerantz’s departure, Bragg seemingly did a U-turn and decided to move forward with charges against Trump after all. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
S., at 485–486; alterations omitted); Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am by Peter J. Sluka
  We previously covered the cases of Budis v Skoutelas, Short Form Order, Index No. 702060/13 [Sup Ct, Queens County July 16, 2014] and Pappas v 38-40 LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 30329(U) [Sup Ct NY County Feb. 22, 2018], in which the court held that the estate of a deceased LLC member had no standing to assert derivative claims on the LLC’s behalf. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
Cite forms are copied from Bruen and are condensed by deleting parallel reporter cites and by closing spaces within abbreviations. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In BCL 1104-a cases, the Court does have the power to compel a buyout, even between 50/50 shareholders (see Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Doeblin v MacArthur (2023 NY Slip Op 30133(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2023]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 For simplicity's sake, we will focus on three of these. [read post]