Search for: "Commonwealth v. Pass"
Results 101 - 120
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:41 am
Following last year’s wave of new employment laws (previously covered as follows: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3), Virginia has adopted a variety of new laws that will take effect July 1 and continue to transform the Commonwealth’s employment law landscape. [read post]
24 May 2021, 12:58 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:26 am
It was submitted that any “significant” damage sustained within England and Wales would be sufficient to pass through Gateway 9a. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 6:10 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court will soon decide a confrontation clause issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003:“The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt's essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:04 pm
” (Citing APHA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 6:00 pm
" COUNTY OF BUTLER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I urge you to consider Eichmann v. the People “I was just doing my job” is no defence. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
See Mazzola v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 7:03 am
Hudnell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
A decade has passed, and the federal agencies involved in the third edition, the Federal Judicial Center (FJC) and the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine (NASEM), are assembling staff to prepare the long-needed revisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1101) (15) The term "immigrant" means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens— (A)(i) an ambassador, public minister, or career diplomatic or consular officer who has been accredited by a foreign government, recognized de jure by the United States and who is accepted by the President or by the Secretary of State, and the members of the alien's immediate family; (ii) upon a basis of reciprocity, other officials and… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
§ 1101) (15) The term "immigrant" means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens— (A)(i) an ambassador, public minister, or career diplomatic or consular officer who has been accredited by a foreign government, recognized de jure by the United States and who is accepted by the President or by the Secretary of State, and the members of the alien's immediate family; (ii) upon a basis of reciprocity, other officials and… [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
Kilbride) noted in passing that the use of proxy registration services could be misleading if used for the purpose of obscuring the actual registrant’s identity. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
The Court then examined what Parliament had intended when passing the Act, and whether the language of S.2 rebutted the general presumption against extraterritorial effect. [read post]
