Search for: "Courtney v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
Courtney, 533 F. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
Dukes (which we blogged about here and here) and DFEH v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
State”Here are two endorsements:“Alabama legal history can be surprising. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:13 pm
For a similar recent case from the neighboring state of Lousiana, also involving criticism of a judge during an election campaign, see Bartholomew-Woods v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm
The California-based company was part of the Tamiz v Google Inc 2013 case in England and Wales. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
Courtney M. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:44 am
Affirmed.Case Name: RALPH LAVERNE HUNNICUTT-CARTER v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:43 pm
” Aversano v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:37 pm
See, for example, Phelps v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
Courtney, reaching that conclusion without the angst of this opinion. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:32 am
Insofar as the breach of contract cause of action is based on alleged overbilling, described as billing for legal services that defendants allegedly performed negligently, it is duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645, 645-646 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:41 pm
Susan Kang, Right v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:23 pm
Sasqua Group, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Sasqua Group, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
As a directive, it could only set the minimum legal standards the EU member states had to meet in their own data protection laws; the member states otherwise could craft their own laws as they saw fit. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:25 am
The court held that plaintiff was collaterally estopped by a prior state court decision rejecting the same request under RLUIPA.In Mangus v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm
Polling Issue The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
