Search for: "Cox Communications Inc. "
Results 101 - 120
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2017, 3:15 am
COM, INC. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:15 am
COM, INC. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 11:04 am
Snapchat joins the leading Silicon Valley royalty deadbeats like Facebook with a big IPO filing but relying entirely on losing legal theories like the faux “DMCA license” that was a big loser for Cox Communications. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:57 am
Cox Communications, Inc., 2016 WL 4224964 (E.D. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:46 am
Cox Communications—when it was filed back in 2014, and last month, EFF, Public Knowledge (PK) , and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) urged the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to overturn a ruling that ISP Cox Communications was liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
Cox in Connection With Comcast Cable Communication et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:44 pm
Properly winding down an employment relationship takes, time, negotiation and multiple communications. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:42 am
“To see the community come together for this cause is wonderful in so many ways. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, but that has divided the environmental community. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am
In Cox Broad. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
See also A & M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Cox sought medical care on an outpatient basis at the facilities of Pioneer Medical Group, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
David Kaplan, Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc.: Use tech fingerprinting and scanning in enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Applicable Legal Standards Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:06 am
Cox Fibernet Va., Inc., 602 F.3d 1325, 1338 (Fed.Cir. 2010) (finding that references relating to telephonyand wireless communication were relevant to the Internetand network protocols because the “problem facing theinventors of the Network Patents was related to” theproblem faced by the prior art references). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Alexander; AT&T Services, Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]