Search for: "Dodd v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument on appeal from the a federal district court’s opinion in Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:24 am
SEC Hit By Wave Of Petitions For Removal Of Post-Bartko Collateral BarsIn Gregory Bartko, Petitioner, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
But the court was not convinced, noting that “the fact that a person outside the United States may be a `whistleblower’ under Dodd-Frank does not compel the conclusion he is protected by the Anti-Retaliation Provision. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm by James Hamilton
The comments were submitted at the SEC’s invitation as the Commission prepares a report mandated by Section 929Y of Dodd-Frank to address whether the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:45 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1099 Issues: (1) Whether the “anti-spoofing” provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulation will likely have a significant impact on both financial and nonfinancial end-users. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Court handed down its decision in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:46 pm by Giles Peaker
You wait for 4 years for another case on bannisters and the Defective Premises Act 1972 and then two come along at once… Sternbaum v Dhesi [2016] EWCA Civ 155 Dodd v Raebarn Estates Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 262 (QB) Both can be dealt with fairly quickly and together, as the courts follow the same lines. [read post]