Search for: "Doe v. Mercer" Results 101 - 120 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
Super Aug. 2, 2010) (some citations omitted).Then along comes the South Carolina Supreme Court, and (as we also mentioned before) it does a number on the purported duty to test in Branham v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
(R 3.1-1(c)(v), R 3.1-1(c)(vi) and R 3.2-4) So she is required to encourage and represent her client in interest-based processes, but no rules specifically apply to them. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Danielle Murray
  Most recently, the British Columbia Supreme Court found in Shalagin v Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, that Mercer (the employer) properly terminated its 12-year employee and senior financial analyst, Roman Shalagin, for cause because Shalagin had surreptitiously recorded numerous conversations with colleagues over a number of years. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court in the case of Mercer v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 2:54 pm by Jon Ibanez
In the 1991 California Supreme Court case of Mercer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
In obscenity prosecutions, however, we conduct `an independent review of the material in question and an independent evaluation of the material in light of the Miller criteria,” to ensure that the judgment does not intrude on 1st Amendment rights. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am by Garrett Hinck
Russell Spivak summarized the Second Circuit’s opinion in Doe v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bobby Chesney and Vladeck posted this week’s National Security Law Podcast, addressing the latest developments in the al-Nashiri military commission proceedings, Doe v. [read post]