Search for: "Free v. Chandler" Results 101 - 120 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm by michael
Using a small business or subchapter V filing can speed up the chapter 11 bankruptcy process as well as bring down the cost. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Similarly, Chandler v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Court noted that under case law, citing multiple cases including Byars v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Appeals court reasoned that when a general consent is given, it is “unqualified’ subject only to “reasonableness” citing United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Chandler, No. 07-1583 A conviction and sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to drug related charges are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the conversion of cash to a drug quantity; 2) a failure to apply the 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) factors; 3) ineffective assistance of counsel; and 4) a retroactive revision to sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Delaware: Advanced Notice Bylaw Limited to Rule 14a-8 Proposals From Travis Laster: A few weeks ago - in Jana Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm by Barbara Moreno
Shepherd, Free to Judge:  The Power of Campaign Money in Judicial Elections (2023). 18. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" The upshot of Chandler, Estes and the Richmond cases is that audiovisual coverage of court proceedings is neither prohibited nor required under the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
" The upshot of Chandler, Estes and the Richmond cases is that audiovisual coverage of court proceedings is neither prohibited nor required under the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Delaware Court Looks “Beyond the Purpose Clause” Just last week, in Meyer Natural Foods LLC v Duff, C.A. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Requirements of a Valid Entrapment Claim In this case, the Arizona Supreme Court outlined the requirements needed to make a valid claim of entrapment: Citing State v. [read post]