Search for: "Goode v. Rea" Results 101 - 120 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
  This isn't a good thing, but it is the reality. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:09 pm by appealattorneylaw
Although the trial court found the defense to be inadmissble because the defense failed to meet the Frye test, and the Second DCA affirmed, the opinion is still worth reading because it contains a good discussion of admissibility of scientific evidence under Frye v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm by Giles Peaker
Bank of Scotland plc v Rea, McGeady, Laverty [2014] NIMaster 11 The borrowers’ cases were brought by NI Housing Rights Service, here is their account of the matter. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:36 am
One of the most important reading downs was seen in the decision of Mumbai Bench of the ITAT, in ACIT v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
Sure, it was a good day for patent nerds as the court granted in one-time relist SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am by The Charge
  The defendants were the good guys.Rogers, on the other hand, involved a homicide. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:38 am by SHG
Ordinarily, a defendant claiming that he murdered someone and meant it is a darn good reason to convict him and make him a guest of the state for a good, long time. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 12:30 am
The Supreme Court has made the above statements in SEBI v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
| Danish Supreme Court in Würtz v Coop confirms existence of "de minimis" copyright exception for use of applied art in marketing materials | Swedish Patents and Market Court of Appeal finds request for blocking injunction against ISP disproportionate | General Court refuses DeepMind's trade mark for STREAMS | POSTAUTO: Acquired Distinctiveness for Non-Core Goods and Services? [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Calling for the views of the SG just kicks the can down the road as a formal matter, but it’s good news for the petitioners as a statistical matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:51 am by Ian Patterson
Since an REA is not a claim (and the ASBCA lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a denied REA), the Army must have treated the REAs as claims, or K-Con must have refiled its REAs as claims–the decision doesn’t specify. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:31 am by Lawrence Higgins
Now a judge in Pennsylvania held in the case of Rogers v. [read post]