Search for: "Green v. Liter"
Results 101 - 120
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am
To my mind, it’s simply a case of the literal rule being chosen in favour of the golden or mischief rules – both of which would surely have allowed for a more equitable outcome. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:02 pm
The court also rejected the argument that the appointment of PCAOB members violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, which empowers the President to appoint officers of the U.S., while allowing Congress to vest the appointment of inferior officers as heads of departments (Free Enterprise Fund, et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Nissen v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm
Kholi, No. 09-868 (2011); Duncan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Gevo concedes that the accused Butamax strains do not literally infringe the asserted claims of the '376 patent. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
The first, The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm
" In the Constitution and other late-1700s statutes, the term invasion is used literally, typically to refer to large-scale attacks. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Campbell suggested that the new Labour government’s decision not to proceed with a Leveson 2 inquiry could be a “mistake” that could result in giving “the green light to the press to do what the press likes to do. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Language Line Services, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am
The decision in Shurtleff v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 5:15 am
It is literally Groundhog day. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:11 am
Doggie Freakout DevicesGreen Mountain Fireworks v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
His conception of law had literally nothing to do with justice and everything to do with recognizing sovereign authority. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
Whilst both questions might now seem to have been overcome by the adoption of Article 17 of the DSM Directive, which received the green light from the Council exactly a year ago today [happy birthday! [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:30 am
This creates a literally and symbolically split subject, one subject in two bodies. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Ortiz v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm
When Carlson v. [read post]
