Search for: "Gump v. Gump" Results 101 - 120 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2013, 8:35 am
  And Rex Heinke, co-head of the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice at Akin Gump, for work on something called Brinker... [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:11 am by John Steele
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, S.D.N.Y., No. 11 civ. 5994 (CM), 5/24/12). [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
This blog also posted a Q&A with Patricia Millett, head of Akin Gump’s Supreme Court litigation practice and co-chair of the national appellate practice. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:20 am by Kedar
Her most recent appearance was in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm by Zoe Tillman
His Supreme Court work included defending affirmative action policies in several landmark cases, including 2003’s Gratz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 504 F.3d 1262 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:36 pm by Christopher Danzig
Akin, Gump Says Movie Producer Owes It [Courthouse News] Akin Gump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 Two great Jims among your number—former Chief Judge of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and retired brigadier Jim Cullen and Akin-Gump Super Lawyer and former terrorism case prosecutor Jim Benjamin—provided me a list of topics that might be of interest to this audience, which I understand includes members of the Committees on Military Affairs and Justice, International Human Rights, and Criminal Law, as well as the Task Force on National Security and the… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:17 am by tracey
Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP; [2011] EWCA Civ 1574;  [2011] WLR (D)  39 “As regards quantification and repayment, a third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 was of limited use to a third party, since, after payment, it was not possible to require solicitors to pay to the third party money which they had received from their client and which the client was bound to pay them, merely because the third party was not… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail)… [read post]