Search for: "Harvey v. Harvey" Results 101 - 120 of 1,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
McDonald’s has filed applications for McDONALD’s, MCCAFE, and its M Logo covering, among other things, “[v]irtual food and beverage products” in Class 9 and “[o]perating a virtual restaurant featuring actual food and beverages” in Class 43 (see here, here and here). 2. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
ReferencesAlban, L., Poulsen, M.K., Petersen, J.V., Lindegaard, L.L., Meinert, L., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
The Supreme Court of British Columbia’s decision in Gibraltar Mines Ltd. v Harvey, 2022 BCSC 385 is sure to be cited or read by anyone requiring a tidy summary of the law in this area. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 12:59 pm by Giorgio Luceri
This question was recently answered in a judgment of the CJEU in Case C-183/21 (Globus v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  The style of the opinion is Landmark American Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm by Matthew Guariglia
  TAKE ACTION TELL the mayor: we need protections against police surveillance Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Becky
This indicates that the “norms of the sector” test is still at the forefront of the court’s mind, providing proprietors with some hope for enforcement and the possibility of successfully riding off into the sunset...Picture on top middle is by Riana Harvey, who grants permission for its use.Pictures of marks are in the public domain.Picture on lower middle is by Francis Helminski and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:26 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In its December 2021 decision in Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Emily Dai
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]