Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 63,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 12:05 pm
By Mitchel Wilson The Federal 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, in Desarduoin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
“Amy Coney Barrett Thinks the Constitution Is Optional For State Courts; Her dissent in Cruz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Employee's claim that her position was eliminated and she was terminated because of her political affiliation rejected by the Appellate DivisionWehlage v Quinlan, 2008 NY Slip Op 07382, Decided on October 3, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentMary Ann Wehlage sued the City of Olean contending that it had eliminated her position as animal control officer then terminated her employment because of her political affiliation in violation… [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:50 pm
Professor Luke Milligan has recorded a Federalist Society podcast on Herring v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:52 pm
The post State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 8:20 am
The State charged ... [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:51 am
Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 62; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 326 “A judge’s membership of a Jewish association whose magazine had expressed extreme views against Palestinian causes did not in itself imply that the judge shared or endorsed such views so as to require her determination of an immigration appeal by a Palestinian activist to be set aside. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:19 am
The post State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:18 am
Al Hassan-Daniel and another v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 1443; [2010] WLR (D) 331 “There were perceptible and sound policy reasons why the defence of ex turpi causa non oritur actio did not form part of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, save when the matter came to just satisfaction. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:50 pm
The post State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Hoffman argues she did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to counsel, the circuit court made evidentiary errors, and the State made an improper closing argument. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 7:34 pm
Documents: State v Newcomb 2016.pdf (135.69 KB) [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Ortiz v United States, 585 U. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:44 am
In a 2015 case entitled Aguas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
In McLean v. [read post]
