Search for: "Howard M. Wasserman"
Results 101 - 120
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh and Howard Wasserman explain the doctrine). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Jacobs Aviation Law Blog Drexel M Dan Filler The Faculty Lounge; Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports Duke F Kimberly Krawiec The Faculty Lounge Emeritus, Univ. of Toledo M Howard Friedman Religion Clause Florida M Jeffery Harrison Class Bias In Higher Education Florida M Daniel Sokol Antitrust & Competition Policy Florida International M Howard Wasserman… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” PrawfsBlawg has commentary on the decision from Howard Wasserman here, Stephen Sachs here, and Cassandra Roberts [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
Howard Wasserman notes that: The problem is an (anecdotal) strong resistance in the legal market to do so. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at Monday’s decision in Venezuela v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg picked up on Frank's video as well, and runs with it in a different direction altogether. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
(Full disclosure: I’m in this camp.) [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 3:58 am
That’s not really an accurate description nor a realistic concern, as Howard Wasserman explains. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In the immediate aftermath of the decision, Howard Wasserman argued that the Court's position was the best approach in light of the Court's efforts to tighten the definition of jurisdiction in recent years. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:07 am
In a follow-up, Howard Wasserman raised questions about the reciprocity aspect, what professors called students. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
As Howard Wasserman adds at the end, there is a federal case out of Florida that rejected the “true threat” analysis, but it’s neither precedent nor principled. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Commentary and analysis come from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (here and here), Kevin Snider at JURIST, and Fred Woocher at the Election Law Blog, who discusses what the voting alignment suggests about the Justices’ views of the merits of the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In an excellent analysis of the case for SCOTUSblog, Professor Howard Wasserman noted that repeated instances of laughter interrupted the oral arguments: “Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:31 am
Ten years and I'm just getting started? [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
A sober legal analysis of the claims comes from Howard Wasserman at the Sports Law Blog (via TortsProf) and a snarky analysis from David Nieporent at Overlawyered;As we get ready for trial, we always wonder about juries and jury selection. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Howard M. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Howard M. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm
For a more detailed explanation of the procedural obstacles to challenging SB 8, see this excellent article by Charles "Rocky" Rhodes and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
