Search for: "In Re Phillips"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 2:18 pm
District Court Judge Virginia Phillips ruled that the discriminatory and counterproductive policy known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) violates the constitutional rights of lesbian, gay and bisexual servicemembers. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
Peter Phillips (commercial mediator, former Senior VP of CPR) recently had an interesting post on resolving conflicts. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:49 am
They’re looking for other supporters to step up with donations, too. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Phillips Farms, LLC, Serial No. 78669171 (March 26, 2008) [not precedential].Syrah grapesThe PTO first squashed Applicant's argument that the case was not ripe for appeal: the subject application was filed under Section (1)(b) and, since a specimen of use had not yet been filed, the PTO incorrectly "conducted a preliminary review and found that the mark PETIT-PETITE is descriptive for wine, all wines, in all market conditions, absent the realities of the mark used… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
If you're a victim of an attack by a vicious dog, you have the right to ask for justice. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 9:50 am
The first, as in the Phillips case, involves minors. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
” He added Phillips would be arrested should she try to re-enter the United States through a normal entry point. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
By Courtney Phillips Google is the go-to provider of many things online-search, email, maps, and more. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
In sum, Phillips's criminal history was supported by the record, and therefore, we find no abuse of discretion. * * * [Re Phillips' unsupported claim that he was the sole support of his 13-year-olid daughter, the Court wrote:] Our supreme court has said, "[m]any persons convicted of serious crimes have one or more children and, absent special circumstances, trial courts are not required to find that imprisonment will result in undue hardship. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
Via Amend the CPSIA, which had this report on Phillips in December; earlier on CPSIA and stuffed animals here and here. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:47 pm
They're vulnerable people buying used cars. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:08 am
The Board found helpful guidance in In re Phillips-Van Heusen Corp., 63 USPQ2d 1047, 1052 (TTAB 2002), where the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) deceptive misdescriptiveness refusal of SUPER SILK for "shirts made of silk-like fabric:"A general proposition which may be distilled from the foregoing cases is that if the word “super” is combined with a word which names the goods or services, or a principal component, grade or size thereof, then the composite term is… [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:13 pm
You’re David Letterman. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
This time, the trial court denied Phillips’ requests, holding that they were bared by res judicata, collateral estoppel and the statute of limitations, since Philips had never appealed the final order from the first superior court proceeding. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
Thanks for all of the fun and we're already cooking up something interesting for next year... [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:05 am
"The officers are held to the same standard as the public, and in most cases, we're held to an even higher standard, because the public perception is that we should always be above board and above the law. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:33 am
(For prior Law Blog coverage of Phillips, click here and here.) [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 3:18 pm
Anytime LA fans take video and photos of heroic home-game plays we’re inadvertently marketing for Phillips 66. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:19 pm
If you look down on the (DOJ) list today you're sure for a BIG surprise! [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm
MEMORANDUM TO PARTNERS / EYES ONLY From: Matt Muttley, Managing Partner Date: 25th December 2010 RE: A CHRISTMAS CAROL Gentlemen, I appreciate that we have scheduled four hours on Christmas Day to attend to matters of family but, as you know, our firm is a 24/7/365 operation and I wish to confirm that we have full cover. [read post]
